Mesothelioma Litigation

Asbestos companies continued to endanger the lives of workers and families for years before admitting the harmful effects and dangers that asbestos exposure causes. If you or a family member has been exposed to asbestos or suffer from meosthelioma, please contact us to learn more about Mesothelioma Litigation.


 

__Mesothelioma Litigation


Asbestos & Mesothelioma Litigation News

June 10, 2003, "Queen’s medical expert dies" The Queen’s medical expert in Canada has died after making significant contributions to linking asbestos exposure to mesothelioma. After working in South Africa in 1960, he suggested a connection between asbestos exposure and mesothelioma. Extensive work was performed with asbestos fiber counts compared to the normal population versus shipyard workers.

June 8, 2003, "Controversial asbestos screening" There were hundreds of examiners in Oregon, Washington, Montana, and other states to screen hundreds of veteran aluminum workers. What the examiners found was that 30-40% of the tested workers showed signs of asbestos related diseases, including mesothelioma. Since some people have not yet experienced symptoms, individuals worry that one day they will suffer the serious and deadly diseases associated to asbestos exposure but do not know when it will strike.

Public health reports from 1920s to 1960s had a high number of incidents of workers that were injured and killed because of asbestos exposure. Doctors had learned from the many asbestos patients that the asbestos fibers could scar lungs and membranes if inhaled to result in deadly cancer such as mesothelioma.

For years, workers continued to suffer asbestos related illnesses and many workers never talked about it because of the economy and some people just did not realize the risks they were enduring. In addition, due to the latency period of disease symptoms onset, many asbestos exposed workers are now just getting diagnosed with illnesses. As more information was learned, a higher number of asbestos- mesothelioma lawsuits were filed over the years. Now, some people are hoping asbestos screening will better identify mesothelioma sufferers, as well as other illnesses, in order to combat the problems of asbestos-exposed workers.

Contact us to confer with an asbestos- mesothelioma lawyer.

June 3, 2003, "New drug aimed towards mesothelioma treatment" There is an experimental cancer drug made by Eli Lilly and Co. called Alimta that is seeking federal approval for expanded use. The drug has shown fewer side effects than rival drugs with the same effectiveness. Lilly first aimed to target Alimta for mesothelioma patients caused by asbestos exposure, however the company is now trying to expand the drug use for all lung cancer patients after the Lilly sponsored study.

Alimta will probably still be more targeted towards mesothelioma asbestos exposed patients and will be lucrative according to Friedman Billings Ramsey & Co. investment firm that forecasted sales of $157 million by 2006. If used for all types of lung cancer, Lehman Bros. Predicts peak annual sales for Alimta of $1 billion.

Alimta showed signs of effectively lengthening the lives of mesothelioma patients in earlier studies. Mesothelioma is diagnosed in 10,000 people around the world every year and is a rare and deadly cancer of the lung lining caused only by asbestos exposure. FDA approval has allowed Alimta to be used for free on a compassionate use basis for over 600 mesothelioma patients and is currently the only approved mesothelioma drug in the U.S. Lilly is hoping to receive FDA approval in late 2003 or early 2004 for the mesothelioma asbestos drug. Contact us to confer with an asbestos- mesothelioma lawyer.

January 8, 2003, "The Public Citizen consumer group called on the Bush Administration to allow the EPA to issue a nationwide warning of asbestos dangers." Asbestos is a very hazardous material and is estimated to be present in 15-35 million homes. A known human carcinogen, Public Citizen sent a letter to the director of the Office of Management and Budget, Mitchell Daniels, asking for an explanation on why the White House diffused a national health warning about asbestos when millions of Americans are being exposed to the danger.

Exposure to asbestos can cause mesothelioma, a rare form of cancer occurring in the lining of the lungs, chest, and abdomen. Asbestos exposure is the only known cause of the mesothelioma, which so far has no standard practice treatment associated to the disease. Public Citizen had tied John Graham, administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, a part of the Office of Management and Budget to ties to the industry in a 2001 report. Graham was an influential part of eliminating the nationwide asbestos danger warning, a move that Public Citizen had anticipated because of his interests in the industry.

The EPA Administrator was prepared to declare the public health emergency until the White House budget office’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs stepped in, and Public Citizen is asking Daniels to authorize the EPA to move ahead with the intended asbestos public notification. The consumer group thinks that the White House’s decision to block the EPA is putting industry interests over public safety.

January 8, 2003
Public Citizen has sent a letter to Mitch Daniels, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget following a December 29, 2002 St. Louis Post-Dispatch article entitled “White House Office Blocked EPA’s Asbestos Cleanup Plan”. The article, according to Public Citizen, calls attention to the office interfering with the EPA’s plan to declare a public health emergency in Libby, Montana and nationwide due to the dangers of Zonolite insulation. Zonolite insulation contains asbestos fibers, an extremely cancerous material that is estimated to be in 15-35 million American homes.

The article was based off of nine file boxes of information that had been gathered from EPA records. There are certain points of the article that Public Citizen highlighted that the article reported. Relevant asbestos facts in particular were called to Daniels attention in the letter from Public Citizen, including:

  • Millions of households throughout the nation are contaminated with Zonolite. Memos from the EPA and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry repeatedly cite an estimate that between 15 and 35 million homes throughout America are insulated with Zonolite. Government extrapolations and interviews with former W.R. Grace Zonolite salesmen indicate that Zonolite insulation exists in 800,000 homes in Illinois, 700,000 in Michigan, and 380,000 in Missouri.
  • The asbestos in question is far more cancerous than "normal" asbestos. Dr. Alan Whitehouse, a pulmonologist who has worked with NASA and the Air Force, has demonstrated that tremolite (the asbestos fiber found in Zonolite) is "10 times as carcinogenic as chrysotile (the more prevalent form of asbestos), and probably 100 times more likely to produce mesothelioma (a ‘fast moving cancer of the lung’s lining’) than chrysotile." According to the article, the EPA has documented "how even minor disruptions of the material by moving boxes, sweeping the floor or doing repairs in attics can generate asbestos fibers." W.R. Grace, the company that provided the tremolite in Zonolite, has settled hundreds of suits that claimed death or illness from exposure to Zonolite.
  • EPA intended to declare a public health emergency and issue a national warning on Zonolite, but was thwarted by OMB/OIRA’s directive from doing so. EPA Administrator Whitman told her staff to move forward with the emergency declaration for Libby, Montana and national public notification. News releases were written and rewritten, lists of Governors to be contacted and politicians to notify were compiled. The White House acknowledged its active involvement in the issue, and opposed the declaration and public notification. Specifically, the article claims that "it was the White House budget office’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs that derailed the Libby declaration."
  • OIRA refuses to explain the basis of its decision. When contacted by the author regarding its role, the White House’s Office of Management and Budget (OMB) spokesperson Amy Call referred questions to the EPA. Repeated requests by Mr. Schneider for interviews with you or anyone else involved in OMB’s decision were denied. Both OMB and EPA refused Freedom of Information requests by the author for documents to and from OMB concerning the matter.

Read Public Citizen letter

December 29, 2002, "Cancellation for plans of a nationwide asbestos danger warning meets heavy criticism" The EPA was planning a nationwide announcement to warn the public of the dangers of asbestos, found in ten of millions of American homes. The EPA asbestos warning was to occur in April 2002, but the White House cut in and it has still never been made. Asbestos was used in Zonolite insulation that was sold all through North America from the 40s through the 90s. The only known cause for the rare form of cancer called mesothelioma, asbestos exposure has serious and deadly effects.

The White House’s decision to interfere with the EPA’s plans has been met by a lot of criticism from many different groups that see the motivation coming from industry interests instead of for public safety. Not only has the White House decision received criticism from the EPA, senators, physicians, scientists, advocacy groups, but residents of Libby, Montana. In April 2002, the EPA declared a public health emergency in Libby.
Documents show that there was information over two decades earlier for the agency to warn of the dangers Libby residents were enduring. When the EPA finally announced the Libby asbestos emergency the agency made it appear as if Libby was in a unique situation because they anticipated a nationwide fear. The EPA allowed the St. Louis-Dispatch access to the thousands of documents contained in nine large file boxes. What the boxes revealed about the asbestos crisis was that internal and external battles have existed for years on end regarding warning the public of the dangers.

How many homes contain Zonolite is unknown, however EPA and Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry estimated 15-35 million homes contain the dangerous asbestos-contaminated insulation. Please contact us for more information on the dangers of asbestos

October 1, 2001, “Federal-Mogul Corporation Files Voluntary Chapter 11 and Administration Petitions to Resolve Asbestos Claims” Federal-Mogul Corporation today announced that to separate its asbestos liabilities from its true operating potential, the company and its United States subsidiaries have voluntarily filed for financial restructuring under Chapter 11 of the U.S Bankruptcy Code. Federal-Mogul subsidiaries in the United Kingdom have jointly filed for Chapter 11 and Administration under the U.K. Insolvency Act of 1986. None of the subsidiaries outside of the U.S. or U.K. are inclusive of these filings. The filings were made in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Wilmington, Delaware and the High Court of Justice in London so that Federal-Mogul can develop a plan in order to resolve their asbestos liabilities. Federal-Mogul will continue their everyday business operations while restructuring.

June 26, 2001, “USG Files For Bankruptcy” U.S. Gypsum has been named in over 250,000 asbestos-related personal injury claims, and paid more than $450 million for litigation before insurance recoveries since 1994. The subsidiary's personal injury costs have increased from $30 million in 1997 to more than $160 million last year, and were expected to exceed $275 million this fiscal year.

USG filed for bankruptcy protection in U.S. District Court in Wilmington, Del. Foote felt it was important to deal with all the lawsuits in one court before one judge in order to recognize the “true” asbestos victims.

April 2, 2001, “W.R. Grace & Co. Files Voluntary Chapter 11 Petition to Resolve Asbestos Claims” W. R. Grace & Co. announced they have voluntarily filed for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in response to the large amounts of asbestos claims. The filing includes 60 domestic entities and none of their foreign subsidiaries.

The filing, made today in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Wilmington, Delaware, will enable the Company to continue to operate its businesses in the usual manner under court protection from its creditors and claimants, while using the Chapter 11 process to develop and implement a plan for addressing the asbestos-related claims against it. The Company intends to work closely with asbestos claimants and other creditors to develop a plan of reorganization that will both address valid asbestos claims in a fair and consistent manner and establish a sound capital structure for long-term growth and profitability.

March 3, 2001, “Asbestos victim awarded landmark compensation” More than $370,000 in compensation by the Dust Diseases Tribunal in New South Wales was given to a 62 year old woman who contracted mesothelioma from washing her husband’s work clothes. Winnifred Brennan was first diagnosed with mesothelioma in July 1999 and is only expected to live another 14 months. Her case is the first non-occupational asbestos case to be rewarded. The ruling came from Judge James Curtis who felt her service to her husband should be compensated when she was diagnosed with having mesothelioma at the same time she was caring for her husband whom was dying from terminal bone cancer.

::
Is Asbestos Still Found In Products Today?

There are still many products that contain asbestos today. A few of the asbestos-containing products are:

  • pipe and duct insulation
  • building insulation
  • carpet underlays
  • roofing materials
  • wall and ceiling panels
  • artificial fireplaces and materials
  • toasters and other household appliances
  • furnaces and other furnace door gaskets
  • patching and spackling compounds
  • electrical wires
  • textured paints
  • brake pads and linings
  • potholders and ironing board pads
  • hair dryers
  • floor tiles
  • cements
::
Diagnosing Mesothelioma
  It is difficult to diagnose mesothelioma because the symptoms are similar to many other conditions. A full physical examination as well as reviewing the patient’s medical past, including any asbestos exposure can help determine if mesothelioma is present.
Mesothelioma Litigation - Top of Page